Sức mạnh chiến hạm Mỹ co thể hủy diệt can cứ TQ tại Trường Sa

??u ??n có th? là lo?i h?t nhân W80 (BGM-109A) ho?c ??u ??n n? m?nh n?ng 450 kg (BGM-109C/ RGM-109B) ho?c ??u ??n chùm (BGM-109D).

Tuy nhiên ?? ?áp ?ng tình hình m?i, ??n tháng 6/2007, USS Michigan ?ã ???c hoán c?i t? tàu ng?m h?t nhân chi?n l??c thành tàu ng?m h?t nhân mang tên l?a có ?i?u khi?n (SSGN).

Vì v?y, không ph?i ng?u nhiên mà chuyên gia Kyle Mizokami ?ã ??a ra nh?n ??nh:

Ban ??u, USS Michigan ???c thi?t k? v?i vai trò tàu ng?m chi?n l??c mang tên l?a ??n ??o xuyên l?c ??a (SSBN), v? khí m?nh nh?t c?a nó là 24 tên l?a Trident II có t?m b?n 11.300 km, mang theo ??u ??n h?t nhân W76 ho?c W88 có ???ng l??ng n? 300 – 400 kT.

kyle Mizokami

Thông s? k? thu?t c? b?n c?a USS Michigan: l??ng giãn n??c 16.764 t?n khi n?i và 18.750 t?n khi l?n, chi?u dài 170 m, chi?u r?ng 13 m, m?n n??c khi n?i 12 m.

chuyên gia an ninh – qu?c phòng châu á

USS Michigan ???c kh?i ?óng ngày 28/2/1975, h? th?y ngày 4/4/1977 và chính th?c ?i vào ho?t ??ng ngày 11/9/1982. Tuy nhiên, m?t l?c l??ng ?? b? c?a Th?y quân l?c chi?n có th? xóa s? chúng m?t cách ??n gi?n.

Tên l?a hành trình Tomahawk tùy thu?c vào phiên b?n có t?m b?n t? 1.300 km (BGM-109D) cho ??n 2.500 km (BGM-109A). Trong th?i chi?n, “tu?i th?” c?a chúng có l? ch? ???c tính b?ng ngày, n?u không mu?n nói là gi?.

Trong ?ó ?áng chú ý nh?t là phiên b?n Tomahawk BGM-109D, v?i ??u ??n mang theo t?i 166 qu? bom chùm.

?nh ?? h?a mô t? vi?c phóng tên l?a t?n công m?t ??t t? tàu ng?m h?t nhân l?p Ohio

Tàu ng?m h?t nhân USS Michigan (SSBN-727/SSGN-727)

Bên trong x??ng ch? t?o phi c? M? tu?n tra ? Bi?n ?ông

M?c dù Trung Qu?c có th? s? l?p ??t h? th?ng phòng không HQ-9 (t??ng t? nh? các tên l?a Patriot c?a M?) ? ?ây. Hi?n t?i, c?ng nhà c?a tàu là Bangor, Washington.


H? th?ng ??ng l?c c?a tàu g?m 1 lò ph?n ?ng h?t nhân S8G PWR cung c?p n?ng l??ng cho 2 turbine, ?i kèm v?i 1 ??ng c? ph? tr? có công su?t 325 mã l?c (242 KW). T?ng công su?t ??ng c? c?a USS Michigan là 60.000 mã l?c (45 MW).

Tàu có th? ch?y v?i v?n t?c t?i ?a 25 h?i lý/h (46 km/h), ?? sâu l?n l?n nh?t trong th? nghi?m là 240 m, t?m ho?t ??ng ch? b? gi?i h?n vào l??ng th?c, th?c ph?m mang theo ?? ph?c v? cho th?y th? ?oàn g?m 15 s? quan và 140 nhân viên.

M?t ??t t?n công c?a 10 tên l?a hành trình Tomahawk-D s? t?o ra 1.660 qu? bom bi, phá h?y toàn b? máy bay, radar, tháp ?i?u khi?n, kho ch?a nhiên li?u, xe b?o d??ng và kho ??n d??c xây trái phép c?a Trung Qu?c trên ??o nhân t?o.

Thay ??i l?n nh?t là vi?c các b? phóng tên l?a ??n ??o Trident II b? g? b? và thay th? b?ng 154 b? phóng tên l?a hành trình Tomahawk, b? trí trong 22 c?m 7 ?ng phóng.

USS Michigan (SSBN-727/SSGN-727) là chi?c th? hai thu?c l?p tàu ng?m chi?n l??c mang tên l?a ??n ??o xuyên l?c ??a l?p Ohio, nó c?ng ??ng th?i là chi?n h?m th? ba c?a H?i quân M? ???c ??t theo tên bang Michigan.

Tóm l?i, nh?ng c?n c? quân s? này tuy r?t quan tr?ng v?i Trung Qu?c, nh?ng c?ng có th? b? công kích t??ng ??i d? dàng

FOXNews.com – Quality of Nuclear Devices Questioned – Politics | Republican Party | Democratic Party

halted in 1992, and through a different process than the replacements. These means included small-scale plutonium tests, technical data from past underground tests, and computer codes and models.

The agency acknowledged there were “more than 70 engineering authorizations” _ as it characterizes the waivers _ approved in the new W88 pit certification and that this was a “relative high number.”

The government will not say how many W88 warheads it has. To scientists at Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico, that was a milestone to celebrate. That required extensive computer modeling and testing to assure precise shape, size and weight and that the triggers meet performance requirements.

Project on Government Oversight: http://www.pogo.org

Los Alamos National Laboratory: http://www.lanl.gov/

In an e-mail response to the watchdog group’s claims, Bernard Pleau, a spokesman for the agency’s office at Los Alamos, said the changes do not “compromise the integrity of the parts. It meant the warheads, after testing that makes the original trigger unsuitable for reuse, could be reassembled with a new trigger and put back into service.

In a warhead’s detonation, a conventional explosive packaged around the pit compresses the plutonium inward, creating enough pressure for an atomic chain reaction. She posed that question in a letter last Friday to Energy Secretary Samuel Bodman.

At least one other replacement pit required 71 specification waivers, a Los Alamos scientist indirectly involved in the production process told The Associated Press. So far, nine have earned the “diamond stamp” from the National Nuclear Security Administration, which oversees the lab’s programs. Precise manufacture of the trigger is essential.

“The manufacturing process for the W88 has been incredibly, thoroughly vetted,” said Jeanloz. That difference in cost was noted by Brian in the letter to the energy secretary.

Copyright 2008 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. He was on a panel that last year concluded the plutonium in warhead triggers is much sturdier than previously thought, with a life span of as much 100 years.

Officials say the cost figures reflect the fact that new facilities and a new process for making the replacement triggers had to be developed. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

The Project on Government Oversight says it was told by some Los Alamos scientists that the trigger certified last July and known as the W88 pit needed 72 waivers from the specifications used for the original triggers, including 53 engineering-related changes.

The government acknowledges differences between the old triggers and their replacements.

Since last summer’s announcement, the Los Alamos lab has made 10 additional W88 triggers. The result is a a massive hydrogen blast.

The change in manufacturing process, from wrought to cast, has been a subject of debate and extensive analysis among those involved in nuclear weapons. no longer conducts underground nuclear tests, the Los Alamos scientists had to rely on other sources to replicate the original triggers and guarantee that the replacements would be as reliable as the old. That, in turn, creates the high temperatures and pressure to ignite a “secondary” nuclear component. The number has been estimated at about 400, in addition to an estimated 3,200 W76 warheads that also are designed for the submarine-based Trident II missile.

“With this large number of waivers, how is it possible to objectively tell whether the pit will even work?” said Danielle Brian, executive director of the group that monitors nuclear weapons-related activities. The original triggers, all made at the now-closed Rocky Flats facility in Colorado, were hammered into precise form. The last of the original triggers were manufactured in the late 1980s.

A single trigger made at Rocky Flats cost less than $4 million. The bottom line _ the pits produced meet all functional quality requirements for use and are fully accepted by NNSA.”


The new ones were made by using a mold to cast the grapefruit-size plutonium sphere. For years, however, testing the warhead’s components to ensure the weapon produces the intended blast instead of a fizzle has been complicated by a lack of replacement plutonium triggers.

Last summer, the first replacement plutonium trigger in 18 years received “diamond stamp” approval signaling it was ready for use in a warhead. This process is viewed by metallurgists as producing a stronger product.

By H. At Los Alamos, it has cost an estimated $430 million over 10 years to certify the first trigger. Scientists at Los Alamos and at the government’s Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in California concluded the change did not degrade the reliability of the triggers, according to NNSA.

But Los Alamos and agency officials bristle at suggestions that the new triggers might be less reliable or have flaws that could affect their performance.

Sunday, January 20, 2008

Because the U.S. The scientist spoke on condition of anonymity because of the sensitive nature of the issue.

National Nuclear Security Administration: http://www.nnsa.doe.gov/

FOXNews.com – Quality of Nuclear Devices Questioned – Politics | Republican Party | Democratic Party | Political Spectrum

A watchdog group now is raising questions about whether the replacement triggers, also known as pits, can be guaranteed to be as reliable as those already in some 400 W88 warheads. The original triggers were made with the benefit of underground nuclear testing, which the U.S. Such approval means they are ready to use.

On the Net:

Kevin Roark, a spokesman for the Los Alamos weapons program said the changes in specifications “have been fully explored, fully vetted and fully accepted by NNSA and engineering analysis (conducted) by us.”

Any variation or flaw in the pit could cause a warhead not to detonate properly or to detonate with less explosive power than expected.

Raymond Jeanloz of the University of California at Berkeley, a longtime adviser to the government on nuclear weapons issues, said in an interview he is not surprised there have been some modification in the W88 warhead, but that does not mean it is less reliable.. JOSEF HEBERT, Associated Press Writer


Resting atop the Trident II missile, the W88 warhead is among the mainstays of the country’s submarine-based nuclear arsenal

Hacking by China not necessarily a “hostile act” – CNN Security Clearance

Martin Dempsey, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said he “believe(s) someone in China is hacking into our systems and stealing technology and intellectual property which at this point is a crime.”

. Asked what he would consider a hostile act, Dempsey said “attacking our critical infrastructure” would be a act worthy of a similar response.

Gen. infrastructure, it would not necessarily be a “hostile act.”

Graham noted he was about to lunch with the Vice President of China who is in the U.S. top military officer said should China’s military be found to be behind hacks into the U.S. this week and asked Dempsey if there was anything he wanted to pass on to Xi Jinping.

But Dempsey told the Senate Armed Services Committee where he was testifying that he cannot attribute the Chinese hacking to China’s military, the People’s Liberation Army.

Asked by Republican Senator Lindsey Graham from South Carolina if it could be proven that the PLA was behind a hacking of the defense infrastructure, would it be considered a “hostile act,” Dempsey said it wasn’t necessarily.

By Adam Levine

“I would consider it a crime,” Dempsey said.

“Happy Valentine’s Day,” Dempsey replied.

The U.S

The cost of military domination

Each aircraft would carry millions of dollars worth of bombs and missiles. The carrier can hold up to 90 aircraft, but even just 40 F-35Cs would represent $13.4 billion dollars, more than the already gargantuan cost of the carrier itself. Amtrak, the national passenger rail system, only has a total of 355 locomotives to haul passengers across the entire country, nearly all of which are over 20 years old and in need of rebuilding or replacement. The category of Military Personnel received $142.9 billion, while procurement–new equipment–received $99.5 billion. At current rates, military and intelligence spending between 2015-2020 will exceed $4 trillion.


Jeff Lusanne

8 May 2015

A largely hidden, yet massive, military cost is the operation, maintenance and replacement of the so-called “Nuclear Triad.” This is the system of nuclear warheads ready for deployment on long range bombers, submarines, and land-based installations, and each of the three elements are up for replacement during the 2020s. The total cost of all the items on the ship is therefore only comparable to entire federal budget items like science, which has a proposed budget of $31 billion for 2016.

Thus, each Ohio class submarine carries nearly 200 nuclear warheads that can simultaneously attack every major city of an entire region of the world–from just one submarine. A January 2014 report from the James R. Research, Development, Test Engineering (RDTE) received $62 billion, while construction and other assorted items took up the rest of the budget.


var html = htmlArray.join(”);

if ($(‘#article-tools’).length 0)





The deficit of the City of Detroit, which was the nominal cause for the city’s bankruptcy and the gutting of city workers’ pensions, was $327 million in 2013–less than the cost of one Navy F-35C. In the FY2016 proposal, another $22 billion would go towards the construction of submarines, destroyers, littoral combat ships, and a fuel tanker. For 2016, the President has proposed a total spending amount of $613 billion that would put Pentagon spending higher than any point during the presidency of Ronald Reagan.

Within the president’s proposed Pentagon budget for fiscal year 2016 there is a proposed 12 percent increase in procurement and RDTE spending to $177 billion, and much of it goes towards big-budget weapons programs designed to maintain total global military dominance.


var html = htmlArray.join(”);

var pCount = $(‘#content’).children(‘p’).length;

var position = Math.floor(pCount*0.2);


function appendBottomAppeal()

var excludes = [ 'lect-a20' ];

var url = document.location.href;

var filename = url.substring(url.lastIndexOf(“/”) + 1, url.length);

if (!$(‘#content’).is(‘.width72,.category’) excludes.indexOf(filename.substr(0,8)) == -1)

var htmlArray = [

When planes, bombs, missiles, crew, fuel, and supplies are added, the cost becomes unimaginably high. Dozens of other planes require tens or hundreds of millions annually.

The largest portion of the defense budget goes towards operations and maintenance of the military’s vast inventory of weapons and equipment. It also notes that Congress has no accurate measure of the actual current spending on nuclear programs.

This vast fleet of aircraft includes some of the most expensive weapons ever created, and current weapons programs that will cost even more. This includes a whopping 78 percent share of the global aerial refueling tanker fleet, the means by which combat aircraft can extend their flight range, allowing the US to more easily bomb anywhere in the world.

Real annual military spending by the United States is even higher, once nuclear weapons funding, interest payments on foreign wars, and the cost of veteran care is included. In 2016, the White House is requesting $11 billion in funding for another year of research, development, and procurement. Five E2-D Hawkeye command and control aircraft are requested for fiscal year 2016 at a cost of $263 million each.

Yet the F-35 is just one of many programs with equally staggering costs. It is over 22 times the amount proposed in the discretionary budget for transportation, $27.4 billion, even as the American Society of Civil Engineers rates the state of US infrastructure as a “D,” requiring trillions of dollars in repairs. In September, when the US began bombing ISIS in Iraq and Syria, the stocks of four of the five largest weapons makers–Lockheed Martin, Northrup Grumman, General Dynamics and Raytheon–soared to all time highs.

The proposed $613 billion in funding is more than eight times larger than the federal education budget. Ford-class carrier was launched in 2015 and cost $12.8 billion.. The entire commercial aircraft fleet in America–including all the major airlines and freight carriers like FedEx and UPS–is less than half that amount, at 6,788 aircraft.

Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.


var html = htmlArray.join(”);

var pCount = $(‘#content’).children(‘p’).length;

var position = Math.floor(pCount*0.1);





return false;


function appendInlineAppeal2()

var excludes = [ 'wsws', 'twih', 'vide', 'sale', 'dart', 'task', 'powe', 'gmhv', 'raul' ];

var url = document.location.href;

var filename = url.substring(url.lastIndexOf(“/”) + 1, url.length);

if (!$(‘#content’).is(‘.width72,.category’) excludes.indexOf(filename.substr(0,4)) == -1)

var htmlArray = [

Compared to other militaries worldwide, the US operates more planes in every type of category (combat, transport, helicopter, training, etc.) than any other nation. Already in 2015, research on these replacements is consuming billions per year, before designs have even been finalized and contracts secured. In the 2016 procurement budget, over twelve separate drone, plane, and helicopter programs each have budgets of $1-3 billion dollars. The public is told there is no choice because “there is no money” for such programs. Tomahawk cruise missiles, the notorious weapon of choice for the “shock and awe” bombardment of Iraq in 2003, now cost $2.1 million each. Given the provocative nature of the US’s activity in Ukraine, Eastern Europe, and the Asia-Pacific region, the possibility of any escalation is an absolutely harrowing prospect.



$.cookie(‘mayday’, ‘seen’,

expires: 1,

path: ‘/’,

domain: ‘wsws.org’,

secure: false











The White House is requesting $1.7 billion in 2016 for research and development on what is likely the next aircraft boondoggle, the Long Range Strike Bomber (LRS-B.) This new, undisclosed “high tech, long range” bomber will replace the B-52, which has rained down death across the world for over 60 years; the B-1; and the B-2, the most expensive aircraft in history at $2 billion per plane. Replacing every single locomotive of Amtrak would cost less than operating one aircraft carrier for one year.

The destructive power of these nuclear forces is almost incomprehensible and greater than anything the world has ever known. In the first three days of the 2011 assault on Libya, at least 161 such missiles were fired; in present-day prices that would cost $338 million, the same cost as the 2,800-foot long six-lane Stan Musial Veteran’s Memorial Bridge across the Mississippi River that recently opened.


var html = htmlArray.join(”);

if ($(‘#article-tools’).length 0)







return false;


function appendBottomAppeal2()

var excludes = [ 'lect-a20' ];

var url = document.location.href;

var filename = url.substring(url.lastIndexOf(“/”) + 1, url.length);

if (!$(‘#content’).is(‘.width72,.category’) excludes.indexOf(filename.substr(0,8)) == -1)

var htmlArray = [

The US military, across all its branches, has 13,900 planes. Despite this, the overall military budget has not mirrored the drop as more money has been plowed into the incredibly expensive, high-tech weapons systems of the Navy and Air Force.

The officially budgeted military spending of the United States in 2014 was $610 billion, nearly 35 percent of global military spending and greater than the combined spending of China, Russia, Saudi Arabia, France, the UK, India and Germany.

Yet nothing costs more money than an aircraft carrier, and the Navy has 10 of them in operation. The 14 current Ohio-class submarines in the Navy’s fleet each contain up to 24 nuclear-armed Trident II ballistic missiles. The most recent cost estimate of the notoriously failure-prone F-35 fighter-bomber is $400 billion for procurement of 2,400 planes, while the lifetime operational cost will be $1 trillion.

The purchase cost of military systems is really just a fraction of their ultimate cost. The US Navy is constructing replacements of their fleet; the first Gerald R. What is never questioned in the political establishment is how a country with crumbling bridges and mass poverty can afford to spend hundreds of billions of dollars each year on the military.


var html = htmlArray.join(”);



else */

var htmlArray = [



var html = htmlArray.join(”);


$(‘#fundAppeal2015 .wrapper .left’).children(‘img, button’).click(function()

if ($(‘#fundAppeal2015′).hasClass(‘video’))

$(‘#fundAppeal2015 .wrapper .video’).empty();


//var html = ‘

Between 2000 and 2006, the US Department of Defense budget rose from $300 billion to over $530 billion, and it continues at those levels, despite the sequester federal budget cuts. The F-22 Raptor, the military’s latest air superiority fighter, is consuming upwards of $500 million per year just for upgrades and modifications. Each missile has a range of over 5,000 nautical miles and upon reentry into the earth’s atmosphere can release eight W88 “multiple independently targetable reentry vehicles.” Each W88 can travel to a separate target and yield a blast more powerful than the bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki.


$(‘#fundAppeal2015 .wrapper .video’).append(html);



$(‘#fundAppeal2015 .wrapper .right form .button’).click(function()

var type = $(‘#fundAppeal2015 .wrapper .right form .type input:checked’).val();

var amount = $(‘#fundAppeal2015 .wrapper .right form .amount input:checked’).val();

if (type == ‘subscribe’)

if (amount == ”) amount = 10;

$(‘#fundAppeal2015 .wrapper .subscribeForm input[name=a3]‘).val(amount);

$(‘#fundAppeal2015 .wrapper .subscribeForm’).submit();


$(‘#fundAppeal2015 .wrapper .donateForm input[name=amount]‘).val(amount);

$(‘#fundAppeal2015 .wrapper .donateForm’).submit();

return false;


$(‘#fundAppeal2015 .wrapper .button-close’).click(function()

$(‘#fundAppeal2015 .wrapper .video’).empty();

$(‘#fundAppeal2015 .wrapper’).removeClass(‘video’);


var expireDate = new Date();

var minutes = 1440;

expireDate.setTime(expireDate.getTime() + (minutes * 60 * 1000));

$.cookie(‘fundAppeal2015′, ‘seen’,

expires: expireDate,

path: ‘/’,

domain: ‘wsws.org’,

secure: false





, 2000);

function appendInlineAppeal()

var excludes = [ 'wsws', 'twih', 'vide', 'sale', 'dart', 'task', 'powe', 'gmhv', 'raul' ];

var url = document.location.href;

var filename = url.substring(url.lastIndexOf(“/”) + 1, url.length);

if (!$(‘#content’).is(‘.width72,.category’) excludes.indexOf(filename.substr(0,4)) == -1)

var htmlArray = [

In 2001, the per-plane estimated cost was $81 million, and the costs continue to rise as the plane is now seven years past its anticipated service date. Martin Center for Nonproliferation Studies is simply titled “The Trillion Dollar Nuclear Triad,” pointing to its estimate that $1 trillion will be spent on nuclear systems by the US in the next 30 years. With these items, the annual amount is closer to $1 trillion.

function popupMaydayAd()

if ($.cookie(‘mayday’) != ‘seen’)

var html = ‘

Operating a carrier strike group has an estimated daily cost of $6.5 million, which is the cost of a new high-speed passenger rail locomotive. Russia, China and France each field just one. The city has announced plans to shut off water service to more than 20,000 households to collect a debt that amounts to about one-eighth the cost of one such aircraft.

Between the branches of the armed forces, 2014 funding was relatively equal: the Army received $167.4 billion, the Navy (including the Marines), $162.1 billion and the Air Force, $144.3 billion. The Army’s costs have the largest connection to personnel, operations, and construction, and as US troop levels have been drawn down in Iraq and Afghanistan the Army’s share of funding has dropped significantly. The B-2 has an ongoing annual cost of $300-$400 million for the last five years. Including all of these costs, each of the 57 planes requested will cost $193 million.


var html = htmlArray.join(”);

$(‘#sidebar .column:last’).prepend(html);


function appendFundAppeal2015()

if ($.cookie(‘fundAppeal2015′) != ‘seen’)

if ($(‘#page’).length 0)

var htmlArray = [

The terrifying destructive potential of the US military, whether conventional or nuclear weapons, is a very profitable business. The Ford-class carrier is meant to feature the F-35C, which is the most expensive variant of the plane, at an estimated $337 million each. Northrup Grumman made the B-2 and is in fierce competition for the lucrative LRS-B contract.

Aircraft carriers are just one aspect of several multi-billion-dollar ship programs. Adding the 2014 and 2015 budgets, nearly $4 billion has been spent for just 15 of these aircraft.

Every passing year in America brings news of cutbacks to essential social programs, from food stamps and home heating assistance to research and infrastructure

Are ‘Mini-Nukes’ The New Big Thing?

Edward Kennedy, the administration has budgeted $700 million for studying how testing might resume.

At the same time, however, last month the United States produced a plutonium pit — the core of a fission bomb — for the first time in 14 years. arsenal. Other efforts include developing lasers and computers to simulate aspects of nuclear tests.

Nuclear Stockpiles: President Bush has agreed to dramatic reductions in the number of nuclear weapons in the U.S. spent more in real terms on atomic defense activities than since 1962.

Strategy — In its Nuclear Posture Review last year, the administration identified Iraq, Iran, Syria, Libya, North Korea as countries where “contingencies” could arise that U.S. Others contend that making more bombs is a bad idea if the U.S. Two had been recovered and three were still missing as of 5 p.m. A bomb of just one kiloton, detonated 30 meters below the earth, can open a crater wider than a football field, according to Princeton physicist Robert W.

However, the administration is paying increasing attention to the possibility that it might at some point have to resume testing if there were a question about the reliability of the nation’s stockpile. wants to stop proliferation.

CBSNews.com’s Jarrett Murphy takes a look at the prospects for the U.S. Last May, he and Russian President Vladimir Putin agreed to slash their active arsenals by nearly two-thirds, to 1700 to 2200 warheads each, within 10 years. Five people watching the surf from Hurricane Bill were swept out to sea at Acadia National Park in Maine. — did not prohibit designing a testing device with a yield below five kilotons, modifying an existing weapon for safety reasons or conducting research and development necessary “to address proliferation concerns.”

“One way you ensure that there are no safe havens is to be able to go deep,” said Armed Services Committee chairman Rep. In the modern U.S. ET Sunday.

AP Photo/Canadian Press/Tim Krochak

By Jarrett Murphy

Copyright 2003 CBS. All rights reserved.

. development of low-yield nuclear weapons.

The Bush administration may get permission to create kinder, gentler or at least smaller nuclear weapons if Congress overturns a ban on doing so.

The defense appropriations bill now winding its way through the Hill contains a clause revoking the 1993 Spratt-Furse amendment, which prohibits the development of so-called “low-yield” nuclear weapons – bombs that pack a punch of less than five kilotons.

But some experts contend that no bomb of any size could go very deep, because the heavier the bomb, the harder the impact — and the harder the impact, the more likely the bomb would explode before it reached sufficient depth.

Testing — The U.S. arsenal, the submarine-launched Mk-5 holds eight W88 warheads of 475 kilotons each.

A memo obtained by a British newspaper indicates that at a conference this summer, Defense and Energy department officials will consider questions like: “What is the uncertainty in confidence and potential risk threshold for a test recommendation–what would demand a test?”

But the administration says smaller nuclear arms may eventually be needed to deal with the emerging threat of rogue states hoarding weapons of mass destruction.

“How can we effectively seek to dissuade others from developing nuclear weapons while we are going forward with the development of new nuclear weapons ourselves?” Sen. policy on nuclear weapons, which has included:

Bunker busters — For the second year in a row, the Energy Department is requesting $15 million to study the need for a Robust Nuclear Earth Penetrator (RNEP).

Supporters say these weapons might be necessary to deal with so-called “hard and deeply buried targets” in rogue states and terrorist camps, of which there might be 10,000 in the world.

“Nuclear weapons have a unique ability to destroy both agent containers and (Chemical and Biological Weapons),” reads a 2001 Pentagon study.

A kiloton is equal to the explosive force of one thousand tons of TNT. Nelson.

The Foster Panel, which studied the testing issue last year, recommended improvements that would allow a test within three months to a year of deciding to do so. Dianne Feinstein, a California Democrat, asked recently.

The ban — named after sponsors Elizabeth Furse, D-Ore., retired, and John Spratt, D-S.C. According to Sen. “If you were to have a problem with a weapon system that you needed to rectify using a test, you would want to be able to do that faster,” J. “nuclear strike capabilities” must be geared towards, according to a leaked copy of the report.

The 1993 low-yield ban that the current defense bill would delete stated that “it shall be the policy of the United States not to conduct research and development which could lead to the production by the United States of a new low-yield nuclear weapon, including a precision low-yield warhead.”

The Little Boy bomb dropped on Hiroshima delivered around 15 kilotons. D. Crouch, the assistant secretary of Defense for International Security Policy, said in a briefing last year.

Announcing its approval of the bill Friday, the Senate Armed Services committee stressed that nothing in the repeal means it has authorized “the testing, acquisition, or deployment of a low-yield nuclear weapon.”

Last year, the U.S. conducted its last nuclear test in 1992, and while the White House opposes the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty — which the U.S. According to the Los Alamos National Laboratory, the move “restores the nation’s ability to make nuclear weapons,” and was needed so the Energy Department could replace pits found unsafe or destroyed through regular check-ups.

CAROUSEL – People watch as water breaches a rock wall at Lawrencetown, Nova Scotia, Canada, Sunday, August 23, 2009. Defense officials said in 2002 that at present, the U.S could go from the decision to test to a trial run in two to three years. Duncan Hunter, R.-Calif., last May.

The move to clear the legal hurdles on manufacturing mini-nukes is part of a broad review of U.S. “Unless we do a lot more research and development and we find some quantum breakthrough in conventional systems, to go deep is going to require a nuclear capability.”

But some members of Congress believe conventional weapons could do the same job, and worry that mini-nukes would blur the line between conventional and nuclear weapons. has signed but not ratified — the administration says it has no plans to conduct a test

Tottenham Hotspur Announces Fun88 as Club’s Asian Betting and Gaming Partner

We believe that our knowledge of developing fun,

interactive and engaging gaming platforms will provide Tottenham

Hotspur’s international fan base with an exciting, new gaming


Fun88 Casino: www.fun88.com/Casino

Daniel Levy, Chairman, Tottenham Hotspur, said: “We are delighted that

Fun88 will become an Official Club Partner. With its unique blend of sportsbook, casino and live dealer

products and with more innovative gaming platforms under development

such as peer to peer gaming and poker networks, Fun88 promises to

deliver the ultimate gaming experience for users each and every time.

The two year agreement, which begins immediately, will see the two

organisations work together to engage with Asian sports fans through a

range of online and offline activities which will include launching a

co-branded gaming microsite.

“Over 60% of our global fan base comes from Asia and together with the

Club’s reach through the Barclays Premier League broadcast platform, we

are ideally placed to support Fun88′s continued growth in the Asian


Fun88 Sportsbook: www.fun88.com/Sportsbook

About Fun88

Notes to Editors:

LONDON–(BUSINESS WIRE)–Tottenham Hotspur Football Club today announced that Fun88, a leading

Asian gaming company, will become the Club’s Official Asian Betting and

Gaming Partner.


. This is the first time the

Club has signed a regional partnership in Asia and is largely down to

the significant increase we have seen in the growth of our international

fan base over the past few years.



Since the launch of Fun88 in 2008, it has successfully merged

entertainment with an unsurpassed gaming experience into a portal that

is both instantly recognisable and the choice of many Asian based

players. Fun88 Promotions: www.fun88.com/Promo

Nick Lee, founder of www.Fun88.com

commented: “I am proud to announce Fun88′s partnership with Tottenham

Hotspur, as the Club’s Asian betting and gaming partner. This

partnership brings together one of Asia’s top online gaming companies

and Tottenham Hotspur, one of the most exciting and attacking clubs in

the English Premier League.

“We are looking forward to working with Club to launch a new bespoke

betting microsite

Should the US government legalize prostitution?

And last I checked it was legal in Nevada.

But in all more domestic situations where the male-to-female ration approaches parity, prostitution is rightly prohibitted on the grounds of the social costs: increased STD rates; increased organized crime activity; increased exploitation and degradation of young desperate women; increased rates of domestic violence, divorce and marital problems; etc.

But all the libertarian “It’s none of the government’s business” assertions are just false. We’re not talking about recreational sex between consenting adults. . Well it can’t legalize it for the simple reason it isn’t currently illegal: there is no Federal statute prohibiting prostitution, and none that requires (or even pressures) States to make it and keep it illegal.

Prostitution laws are simply a State, County Municipal matter. (The US military has always discreetly sponsored it around bases, occupied areas, and near warzones, the top brass considering it essential to morale and discipline. in short, just about every Federal, State, and local regulatory agency there is. — Just what do you think all those USO dances in WWII really were? Though, granted, they tended to be staffed by amateurs.)

As soon as money changes hands it becomes the business of the IRS, the Commerce Department, the Health Department, the CDC, the Labor department, OSHA, the Zoning Board … Prostitution is a business transaction.

For better or for worse, governments have been granted the authority to regulate commerce in their jurisdictions, even to the point of forbidding certain trades and products within their jurisdictions, for whatever reason they think fit.

The fact is, prostitution has typically been legal in “wild West” situations (5 or more young men per 1 woman in the territory) for the reason that it’s necessary to maintaining public order

trang M88.com ca dộ ngan tỉ | Phap luật

???ng dây cá ?? quy mô c?c l?n này do Nguy?n Võ Hoài Trâm (nguyên Giám ??c Cty New Plus, TPHCM) c?m ??u, là ng??i ??i di?n cho M88.com trong ???ng dây t? ch?c ?ánh b?c có máy ch? ??t t?i Philippines.

Có th?i gian ng?n ch?a ??u n?a tháng (t? ngày 6.5.2013 ??n 19.6.2013), Quý ?ã cá ?? s? ti?n lên ??n h?n 7,2 t? ??ng và “con b?c” này ?ã “n??ng” m?t h?n 523 tri?u ??ng cho M88.com. Ba ???ng dây t?i ph?m này ho?t ??ng cá ?? bóng ?á và các môn th? thao khác ??u có liên quan ??n nhau, máy ch? ??u ??t ? n??c ngoài và do các “ông trùm” trong n??c ?i?u hành, có chân r?t n?m kh?p c? n??c, thu hút hàng ch?c ngàn con b?c tham gia, v?i s? ti?n cá ?? lên ??n hàng ngàn t? ??ng. Quý s? d?ng tài kho?n cá nhân c?a mình và c?a c? v? Quý ?? giao d?ch chuy?n ti?n, nh?n ti?n v?i M88.com.

?ã có 12.000 tài kho?n th??ng xuyên chuy?n ti?n ??n M88.com v?i s? ti?n h?n 2.000 t? ??ng. B? cáo tham gia ?ánh b?c có s? ti?n th?p nh?t là 90 tri?u ??ng và cao nh?t là g?n 9 t? ??ng.

Trong s? 59 b? cáo h?u tòa, có 6 b? cáo xét x? v? hành vi “t? ch?c ?ánh b?c” g?m: B? cáo Nguy?n Lê Sang ?ã m? và giao cho M88.com s? d?ng 8 tài kho?n ?? giao d?ch nh?n, chuy?n s? ti?n ?ánh b?c 585 t? ??ng và h??ng l?i 100.000USD, Cù Th? Thanh H?i s? d?ng 6 tài kho?n giao cho M88 ?? làm tài kho?n ??i di?n nh?n chuy?n ti?n g?n 64 t? ??ng, h??ng l?i 35.000 USD, Nguy?n V?n Nam m? 2 tài kho?n ?? nh?n và chuy?n ti?n ?ánh b?c là 45 t? ??ng, h??ng l?i 500 tri?u ??ng, Cù Huy Giáp (em ru?i Cù Th? Thanh H?i) m? và s? d?ng 6 tài kho?n giao d?ch nh?n, chuy?n ti?n h?n 629 t? ??ng và h??ng l?i 100 tri?u ??ng, Ph?m Th? Kim Loan m? và s? d?ng 46 tài kho?n nh?n chuy?n ti?n h?n 500 tri?u ??ng, h??ng l?i 65 tri?u ??ng và Lê V?n H?i m? 4 tài kho?n nh?n, chuy?n g?n 200 tri?u ??ng, h??ng l?i 11 tri?u ??ng.

M88.com là m?t trong nh?ng trang m?ng mà t? ??u n?m 2013 ??n tháng 3.2015, C?c CS?T t?i ph?m v? tr?t t? xã h?i (C45) cùng C?c C?nh sát phòng ch?ng t?i ph?m s? d?ng công ngh? cao (C50) B? Công an ?ã bóc g? 3 ???ng dây t?i ph?m “t? ch?c ?ánh b?c và ?ánh b?c” v?i quy mô c?c l?n là M88.com, 188bet.com và Fun88.com. D? ki?n phiên tòa s? di?n ra m?t tu?n (12 ??n 19.5.2015).

. và ch?i bài Barcarat trên trang M88.com t? tháng 6.2012 ??n tháng 6.2013. Hành trình khám phá án ??y cam go và v?t v?, v?i t?ng l?c l??ng hùng h?u c?a C45, C50 và nhi?u ??n v? nghi?p v? khác tham gia ph?i h?p, cùng công an các t?nh thành trên c? n??c.

Trong ?ó n?i c?m là các con b?c t?i TPHCM và Hà N?i, nh? “con b?c” ?ào Ng?c Quý b?t ??u ?ánh b?c b?ng hình th?c cá ?? bóng ?á ? các gi?i Anh, ??c, Ý, Tây Ban Nha, C1, Châu âu, Euro 2012, các gi?i bóng ?á Qu?c t? khác.

V?i s? l??ng b? cáo r?t ?ông (59 b? cáo) nên TAND TPHCM ?ã dùng phòng x? án l?n m?i ?? ?? ch? cho các b? cáo và nh?ng ng??i ??n tham d? phiên tòa. S? ti?n Chi?n tham gia cá ?? là 900 tri?u ??ng và thua g?n nh? “cháy túi” h?t 800 tri?u ??ng…

S? ti?n mà ???ng dây này t? ch?c ?ánh b?c tr?c ti?p ra n??c ngoài, v?i hàng ch?c ngàn con b?c tham gia kh?p c? n??c, s? ti?n ?ánh b?c thông qua các giao d?ch tài kho?n mà Trâm và ??ng ph?m giao d?ch v?i các con b?c c?ng nh? chuy?n ra n??c ngoài lên ??n hàng ngàn t? ??ng.

Còn l?i 53 b? cáo b? truy t? v? t?i “?ánh b?c”, thì khá nhi?u b? cáo có trình ?? cao, là k? s?, c? nhân, th?m chí là gi?ng viên ??i h?c tham gia ?ánh b?c v?i M88.com. T? k?t qu? ?i?u tra và “con b?c” khát n??c ?ào Ng?c Quý khai nh?n, ch? m?t n?m tham gia cá ?? trên trang M88.com (2012-2013), Quý ?ã s? d?ng lên ??n 9 t? ??ng ?? ?ánh b?c và b? thua t?ng c?ng s? ti?n lên ??n 6 t? ??ng. Hay “con b?c” Bùi V?n Chi?n, tham gia cá ?? trên trang M88.com t? tháng 8.2012 ??n tháng 1.2013, ch? y?u là cá ?? bóng ?á. Th?m chí, Quý còn “khát n??c” cá ?? c? gi?i c?u lông, qu?n v?t, bóng r?… Tuy nhiên, do các con b?c s? d?ng ??a ch? “ma”, nên ch? xác ??nh ???c 127 tr??ng h?p có n?i c? trú.

Trong bu?i sáng nay (12.5), tòa t?p trung ph?n th? t?c khá dài vì nhi?u b? cáo

RPT-UPDATE 2-Asia’s tycoons team up for $1 bln Manila casino | Reuters

Locals are

legally allowed to gamble in the Philippines, creating a much

larger pool of customers than in markets such as Vietnam where

casino gambling is restricted to foreign passport holders.

(Repeats with no changes to text)

By Farah Master and Erik dela Cruz

The two other developers are Bloomberry Resorts Corp

of Filipino billionaire Enrique Razon and the joint

venture between Genting Hong Kong Ltd and Alliance

Global Group.

Three other casino licensees are set to operate in the

sprawling gaming area by the Manila Bay, a project of state

regulator Philippine Amusement Gaming Corp, or Pagcor.

(Additional reporting by Sayantani Ghosh in BANGALORE; Editing

by Rosemarie Francisco and Elaine Hardcastle)

Macau’s gambling revenue growth has dropped significantly in

the past two months, hitting a near 3-year low in May while

June’s figure was weaker than expected.


A loan facility of $320 million may also be made available

to help finance the project, Melco said.

* Melco to invest no more than $580 mln in casino venture

The companies said on Thursday an agreement was set to be

finalised within the next two months.

CLSA predicts gambling revenue in the Philippines will grow

from US$1.3 billion in 2011 to US$3 billion in 2015 once three

new resorts are completed.

HONG KONG/MANILA, July 5 (Reuters) – Macau casino Melco

Crown and Philippine leisure firm Belle Corp signed a

conditional deal to develop a $1 billion casino-hotel that will

see some of Asia’s biggest tycoons team up in Manila, touted as

a promising new gambling market.. * Deal brings together Macau’s Melco, Philippine’s Belle

“The expansion into new jurisdictions where the company

expects strong returns on capital will further diversify the

company’s exposure in Asia,” Melco said.

The $12 billion company is one of six licensed operators in

Macau where the pace of casino expansion is tightly controlled

by the government.

It will be the first time for Melco to venture into the

Philippines as it has focused on Macau, the world’s top gambling

market, where it is waiting final approval to build a casino


Casino expansion across Asia is mushrooming with Vietnam

also due to open a new casino resort in 2013 and markets such as

Taiwan and South Korea consider legalising gambling.

James Packer’s Australian casino group Crown Ltd and

Southeast Asia’s largest gambling group Genting have

both been raising their stakes in Sydney casino operator Echo


Belle plans to build an integrated entertainment resort

complex called Belle Grande Manila Bay, which features a

30,000-square-metre casino in a developing gaming and retail

destination known as Entertainment City in Manila.

Melco, owned by Australian billionaire James Packer

and Hong Kong businessman Lawrence Ho, will join forces with the

Philippines’ wealthiest man, Henry Sy, who controls Belle

to jointly develop and manage the hotel set to rise in

a more than 100-hectare gaming complex.

Melco will invest no more than $580 million using cash, cash

flow and debt financing to help fund the casino resort, the

company said in a statement.

The biggest of the four projects is a $2 billion

casino-hotel complex being built by a unit of Japan’s Universal

Entertainment Corp set for completion in 2014.

* Loan of $320 million may be made available for project

Bloomberry has hired Las Vegas-based Global Gaming Asset

Management to operate its $1 billion Solaire Manila casino-hotel

complex, construction of which will be completed next year.

Analysts are optimistic on the Philippines’ future growth

despite a broader slowdown in the global economy


Jika melakukan deposit tertentu akan mendapatkan hingga IDR 188.000 Freebet. Kaos akan di kirimkan dalam jangka waktu 30 hari setelah Aplikasi di setujui

IDR 200.000 Kaos Jersey Fun88========================================================================

Deposit lagi!Dapatkan FREEBET! Persyaratan Deposit FREEBET Akan di kreditkan setiap hari Kamis.

Promosi ini akan dimulai pada 01 April 2015 (00:00 GMT+8) hingga 30 April 2015 (23:59 GMT+8). Aktifitas ini terbuka untuk 1000 anggota IDR FUN88 yang baru terdaftar pada bulan April

Anggota baru akan mendapatkan IDR 38.000 Bermain GRATIS + Sepuluh (10) putaran GRATIS di permainan slot Sugar PopBisa mendapatkan dua puluh (20) putaran gratis + Kaos Fun88 Limited Edition pada deposit pertama. DITAMBAH bonus Freebet lainnya IDR 100K jika mencapai level 30 pada Sugar Pop

Yang harus dilakukanHadiah BonusKeterangan


di Fun88 IDR 38.000 Bermain GRATIS + 10 Putaran GRATIS pada permainan Sugar Pop *IDR 38.000 Percobaan Gratis + 10 Putaran GRATIS akan di kreditkan ke akun member dalam waktu 3 hari setelah aplikasi melalui Livechat

*CS Kami akan melakukan verifikasi atas akun member melalui panggilan telepon========================================================================

Deposit Pertama! IDR 100.000 20 Putaran GRATIS di permainan slot Sugar Pop *Akan Dikreditkan setiap hari Kamis. Harus melapor ke CS melalui LiveChat.

*CS kami akan melakukan Verifikasi untuk alamat member. Segala jenis taruhan sistematis yang dilakukan pada dua sisi (mis.banker/player, besar/kecil. Harus konfirmasi ke CS melalui LiveChat

IDR 300rb – 999rb IDR 50.000

IDR 1 juta keatas IDR 188.000

Mencapai LEVEL 30 pada permainan Sugar Pop 3D Slot! IDR 100.000 FREEBET Member harus mengirim email ke CS berisi: nama pengguna Fun88, tanggal hari pencapaian LEVEL 30 + screenshot game pada level yang dimaksud. Silakan gunakan “Aplikasi Bonus Selamat Datang” sebagai judul email ke cs.indo@fun88.com

Freebet akan dikreditkan ke Akun Utama pada hari KAMIS berikutnya setelah aplikasi disetujui.

Bonus freebet sepenuhnya akan hangus jika tidak digunakan dan diputar sebanyak 3 kali dalam waktu 30 hari sejak diterima. Dll) tidak terhitung sebagai perputaran yang memnuhi syarat.

Spin gratis akan hangus jika tidak digunakan dalam waktu 7 (tujuh) hari sejak diterima.

Syarat Ketentuan Umum Fun88 berlaku pada promosi ini.